Nutritional assessments of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is not only associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) but it also adversely affects the progression of other liver diseases. There are limited data regarding the dietary habits of patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: Nutrition surveys containing 13 different food groups were mailed. Nutrition scores were calculated based on weekly servings. Foods were also divided into USDA food pyramid categories with conversion of each group into calories expended. Clinico-demographic data were available. NAFLD patients were compared to patients with chronic viral hepatitis. RESULTS: A total of 233 subjects were included: age 52.5 +/- 10.0 years, Body mass index (BMI) 28.1 +/- 6.5, MS 24.2%, 31.8% NAFLD, 48.1% hepatitis C virus (HCV), and 20.2% hepatitis B virus (HBV). Six nutrition indices were different among the groups. NAFLD and HCV consumed more low-nutrient food (p = 0.0037 and 0.0011) and more high-sodium food than HBV (p = 0.0052 and 0.0161). Multivariate analysis showed that NAFLD and HCV consumed more high-fat sources of meat/protein than HBV (p = 0.0887 and 0.0626). NAFLD patients consumed less calories from fruits compared to HCV and HBV patients (p = 0.0273 and 0.0023). Nine nutrition indices differed according to BMI. Univariate analysis showed that obese/overweight patients consumed more high-fat sources of meat/protein (p = 0.0078 and 0.0149) and more high-sodium foods (p = 0.0089 and 0.0062) compared to the normal-weight patients. In multivariate analysis, normal-weight patients consumed more fruits than obese (p = 0.0307). Overweight patients also consumed more calories of meat and oil than normal-weight patients (p = 0.0185 and 0.0287). CONCLUSION: NAFLD and HCV patients have similar dietary habits. Patients with HBV have the healthiest dietary habits. Specific dietary interventions should focus on decreasing intake of low-nutrient and high-sodium food, as well as high-fat sources of meat/protein.

Impact of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis on health utilities using SF-6D and the health utility index.

Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and health utilities have become important aspects of clinical research. Patient-derived utility adjustments are frequently used in economic analysis. Although HRQL has been frequently studied among patients with liver disease, extensive data on the health utilities of patients with liver disease are not available. Recently, SF-6D has been developed to obtain utility scores from the widely used Short Form 36 questionnaire. To assess health utilities of patients with chronic liver disease using 2 utility assessments [SF-6D and Health Utility Index 2 (HUI-2)], a total of 140 patients were identified from our Liver Disease Quality of Life Database with HRQL data available, as well as clinical and demographic data. Of the 140 patients, 42% were female, had a mean age of 49.4 years (standard deviation = +/-11.2) 36% had hepatitis B virus (HBV), 29% had hepatitis C (HCV), 24% had cholestatic liver disease, and 11% had another liver disease (for example, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis). Bivariate analyses indicated that HBV patients had the highest health status as measured by all of SF-6D and HUI-2 subscales and the overall SF-6D and HUI-2 utility measures, whereas patients with HCV and cholestatic liver disease had similar scores, and those with other liver diseases had the poorest quality of life. When controlling for the effects of gender, age, and cirrhosis, impact of chronic liver disease diagnosis on utility scores persisted only for the SF-6D, with HCV patients having significantly poorer health than HBV patients. In conclusion, SF-6D provides not only a generic assessment of HRQL but also a utility score that can be used for economic analysis of patients with chronic liver disease.